audrey kitching

images audrey kitching no makeup. audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching
  • Audrey Kitching



  • nojoke
    01-22 02:16 PM
    Its been 8 yrs, 2 recessions, 3 layoffs, marriage, baby, home, an expensive car, and lots of ego.

    with all this going on for an year for now, I dont have time for GC any more.

    Do you?

    I still love my life whether depressed or surpressed - hahahahha!


    Take it easy. Best of luck.





    wallpaper Audrey Kitching audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching Photo
  • Audrey Kitching Photo



  • nixstor
    07-05 03:00 PM
    Why would this website suddently decide to convert to a paid website? There is a link right on the top requesting funds / contributions, right? People who have resources / are willing to contribute will do it. Look at the postings of the core members who actually started this website. Did they ever make a harsh statement regarding the site visitors who have not contributed? Personally I havn't seen one yet, have you? They are very diplomatic in their efforts and thats what makes them leaders. We dont want juveniles to start dictating regulations in this forum. Lets leave these decisions to mature people who have insight in their decisions, OK. Actions taken when you are emotionally disturbed will do nothing but harm you and the rest of us. This site is and should remain a non paid. I have contributed a small amount sofar, however have found a very pleasant and enjoyable community here at the IV. I know many have contributed much more than me. Please remember that this website / core group efforts all began probably as a selfless act by a group of youngsters to benefit our legal immigrant community. Let not our emotions guide us but let reason guide us in our decisions and the best approach would be to let the core group decide. Now if they decide sternly that this can be run only as long as all the visitors/beneficieries contribute then I dont know what to say. Contributions were all voluntary and should remain voluntary. Some of those who support a paid website seem to be VERY AGITATED. If you are agitated while spending money then think twice before contributing. Dont expect everybody to do do exactly what you do.

    This is a perfect example of how an argument can be twisted and turned around. So you would prefer Pappu or 3 other members to have a funding drive for ever instead of having a constant flow of money? No one questioned the intentions of core members or people who started the website. They not only started this as a place where we can discuss issues, but also as a place where people in similar situations can come together as a community and contribute towards the cause. The contribution is both monetary and personal time. Both grass root efforts and lobbying will bring success. I personally, (who has been vocal on the thread) am not agitated that I am paying and xyz is not paying. People do not see a need to pay for IV because they are getting what they want. Every one on their heart of hearts know what kind of platform we have built here and without $$ it all means nothing. An hour before I spoke with a NPR news reporter and she asked me if I were calling on behalf of IV as soon as I explained the VB fiasco. Its our choice to support through contributions or to undermine the main agenda of the organization.

    Do not try to sell the point that we will lose membership if we make it paid, atleast to me. As I said before, people have come over to IV when hell broke loose time over time. I do not see a reason why they would stop coming. We are highly skilled but not very well endowed financially. What can we do other than lamenting about our personal choice instead of coming together as a community?





    audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching Colorful
  • Audrey Kitching Colorful



  • vicsthedude
    09-17 05:31 PM
    Yes was similar to yours. The status did change to Review. They just got it yesterday and I saw hard lud yesterday and a soft lud today. I did not know how my Attorney responded or worded it, I just sent him the EVL from current employer.

    How many days have passed snce they received your response? Was yours similar to mine. Please look at Page 1 of this thread of my detailed RFE. Did the sttus change for you to "Review"? Sorry so many questions but my attorney is sending the response overnight today and i am so nervous and anxious and scared and.... etc.





    2011 Audrey Kitching Photo audrey kitching. audrey kitching no makeup. en
  • audrey kitching no makeup. en



  • neoneo
    09-26 10:47 PM
    senthil1 makes more sense then this!

    I don't know who senthil1 is, nor do i care. If you nothing to reply please don't waste white space. My comments are not to stir up arguments but an observation.



    more...


    audrey kitching. Audrey kitching
  • Audrey kitching



  • karanp25
    07-14 06:41 PM
    Do you see any LUD change on your I-140 after you changed employers?


    Paper copy: Today
    Email notification: last week





    audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching Pink Crown
  • Audrey Kitching Pink Crown



  • lvinaykumar
    07-16 07:40 PM
    Can we sue them for spreading false information



    more...


    audrey kitching. Audrey kitching
  • Audrey kitching



  • Since1997
    08-15 05:28 PM
    The reason for availability is:

    D. EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY FOR SEPTEMBER

    Due to the return of unused July numbers by consular posts abroad, and the limited amount of pending demand eligible for final processing at consular posts, it has been possible to reestablish cut-off dates in many of the Employment preference categories.





    2010 Audrey Kitching Colorful audrey kitching. audrey kitching no makeup.
  • audrey kitching no makeup.



  • techmia
    07-01 04:40 PM
    Everyone is busy partying.



    more...


    audrey kitching. audrey kitching no makeup
  • audrey kitching no makeup



  • nonimmi
    03-14 05:42 PM
    We sent a letter to USCIS to revoke the existing G-28.
    We just sent a letter and 485 receipt for me and my husband.

    Just wanted to let u know.

    Thanks for sharing the info. Did you get any new attorney?





    hair audrey kitching no makeup. en audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching - Scene
  • Audrey Kitching - Scene



  • abhijitp
    03-05 02:34 PM
    Many of them during the letters campaign, and most are ready to buy a home within a year of getting their green cards!

    On ther other hand I personally know a very highly educated guy (IITBombay, MS then PhD in Electrical Eng- with a specialization in wireless tech) who got his EB GC 2-3 years too late... by that time the tech boom was over but the housing boom had already begun... so he decided to wait a few more years. Now he feels bad about the whole thing, and wonders if he should have bought a home when he was on H1B-- even if it would be frought with risk! That way, he would have been a millionaire today-- just like his friends who got their GCs and bought homes well in time.

    8 years later, the history is repeating itself.
    500,000+ people are patiently waiting in the EB GC queue... and chances are they will helplessly watch as home prices hit the bottom, and then rebound a few years later.

    Some of them might decide to take the plunge and buy a home to take advantage of the low prices. However, many of them may be simply denied this chance becasuse their future is tied to a plastic card that has to be renewed every year!

    Singhsa, sorry cannot help you right now with the media... maybe you can try getting help from the IV-media team?



    more...


    audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching
  • Audrey Kitching



  • perm2gc
    01-10 12:12 PM
    new forums and sites are here
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=16078&postcount=42

    any volunteers?
    volunteers to post in those above listed forums or to search forums ?





    hot Audrey kitching audrey kitching. AUDREY KITCHING
  • AUDREY KITCHING



  • tooclose
    07-13 10:24 AM
    It is not a contradiction to the previous statement.

    Cut-off-date = 1 ==> PDs before 1st can file (i.e mar-01 cut-off date mean pds till apr-30 can file)
    Cut-off-date = 8 ==> PDs before 8 can file (i.e pds 1 to 7 since they are in one bucket)
    Cut-off-date = 15 ==> PDs before 15 can file (specifically pds in bucket 8-14 can file)
    etc...

    Hope it helps. As others predicted, I really think the numbers will not move back. You will get your GC soon.

    yikes !!! so looks like I have to wait then... anyways I was happy for a few moments till I saw this message :)



    more...


    house Hair Look#39;s Of Audrey Kitching audrey kitching. audrey kitching
  • audrey kitching



  • pbuckeye
    02-09 10:46 AM
    i guess he is talking about your case a)...
    although it might be his own opinion which could be wrong but seems from his forums he does tell you valid points time to time....

    and he does post some useful data (remember the recent backlog data he posted before they officially released it).

    anyway, why be so skeptical, don't we watch all the Superbowl ads but only buy the beer we like ;)





    tattoo Audrey Kitching Pink Crown audrey kitching. on Audrey Kitching#39;s Blog
  • on Audrey Kitching#39;s Blog



  • va_labor2002
    07-24 12:38 PM
    Hi rpatel,
    I agree with your points.You are totally right. We should atleast try this channel. I think IV should address this issue to USCIS.

    I concur with the fact that manner in which the law is written/interpreted currently, its going to be an uphill task to convince the USCIS of letting us file I485 without a visa number available. Did the core group make any effort in this direction or is it their foregone conclusion that its non starter at all?

    I believe we should try to make an effort in this direction however small the chance of success may be. My reasons are following:

    1. Even if the USCIS director might not have an authority to change the procedure without congressional intervention first, the effort required to convince a congress man/ congressional committe on this issue will be smaller compared to pushing them to take up SKIL immediately.

    2. I dont know if Dept of Homeland Security might have any say in this but again we can try getting an audience with Negroponte to appraise him of the situation.

    3. Thirdly since CIR/SKIL are currently in dormant stage, coregroup/volunteers might be more open to pursuing low potential/high yield effort like this one is.



    more...


    pictures Audrey kitching audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching lt;3
  • Audrey Kitching lt;3



  • ashkam
    07-28 12:14 PM
    What's with all the fundies crawling out of the woodwork?

    By the way, dear fundies, if you are so against the First Amendment (freedom of speech), why are you in this country applying for a green card anyways? Because, you know, the First Amendment is kind of a big deal here.





    dresses AUDREY KITCHING audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching Gummy Bears
  • Audrey Kitching Gummy Bears



  • ghost
    08-12 07:26 AM
    If there is a non-controversial immi. law change attempt I will donate $500. I will also bring my friends and the total may exceed $2000. We all willing to donate but only if we know that there is good chance of passing.

    If there is an attempt to push ideas like recapture, forget it. It will not pass in this economy. I do not want to waste my money and time on those kind of ideas.

    IMHO. Not to find fault with anyone. Please do not mistake me.

    Hey Buddy,
    recapture is not controversial and has nothing to do with economy...not sure where you got that from, recapture of EB numbers is what we are proposing - this will not take away any american jobs but only alleviate the wait times for folks like you and me. Also, we've to accept the fact that anything related to immigration will be controversial - there is no denying of it, unfortunately.

    Coming to the donations, please don't donate in huge sums because you'll have huge expectations...I'd say start off in small steps - 6 USD per week for 6 months...I signed up for it and it took me 5 minutes and 150 USD for the next 6 months, not too bad right!

    Thanks!



    more...


    makeup audrey kitching no makeup audrey kitching. Hair Look#39;s Of Audrey Kitching
  • Hair Look#39;s Of Audrey Kitching



  • namecheck3yr
    02-21 11:26 AM
    I am trying to immigrate to this country. I feel that I have my own responsibility to make this country a better place. From my own experience, I know that the namecheck is the most ridiculous process, needs immediate fix:
    1. What is the legal base? No legal base makes it become such a black hole.
    2. No time frame, they can use �case by case�, �national security� as excuses to randomly delay your cases.
    3. It�s a lottery, we can only pray, some people get it cleared in one month, some more than 3 yrs.
    4. Case by case? We�ve got a lottery program. Where is the justice, the fairness? How should those affected people plan their living and become a productive citizen?
    5. National security? You should not give those �terrorist suspects� more that 3 yrs of freedom! Should it be done earlier before they enter this country?
    6. The 911 terrorist attacks did not directly affect most people, but name checking makes many people very anxious. They are amplifying the effect of the terrorist attacks and that is what the terrorist wants. What is the efficiency of this measure?
    7. No transparency, nobody knows how they do it.
    8. Not responsive, you cannot get any meaningful response except those excuses.
    9. You are guilty first, you do not have any chance to provide any assistance to them, and they won�t request any either.


    retrohatao willgetgc2005 wam4wam & stirGC,

    Thank You for your input. This is very helpful to highlight the name check problem. The problem description and proposed solution by retrohatao are very good. However, just allow me to share a bigger picture. There is no difference between any issue is being categorized by someone to be a sub-issue or if an issue is categorized as main issue. What is important is that the issue is being addressed ....

    willgetgc2005, just so that you know, I am also stuck in name check since June-04 and my 485 is pending since Oct-03. Just like you, this issue directly affects me. No doubt this is a very important issue. As berkeleybee mentioned, this is being addressed and communicated to the lawmakers and CA team did an excellent job in making the presentation to the lawmakers.

    Even though name check delay issue directly affects people like you and me, know that this is not the only important issue. The point is, many people only care about getting to the next stage of GC process. If someone's labor is stuck, that group thinks that labor certification clearance should be the top priority. If someone's 140 got rejected, then that issue should be the only issue on IV's agenda. If someone is not able to apply for 485, then that person wants to make that as the top priority. If someone is a PHD, then that person wants the top agenda should be to get GC to the guy who has PHD and the argument presented to us is - don't you get it, I am a "PHD". The other day there was a group of people including techworker_tn1, helpful_leo etc who wanted to form their own group for PHDs. And now, if someone's name check is delayed, then we say that everybody will have to go through it sometime in the later stage, so this issue should be on the fore-front of the list of issues.

    I am slightly perplexed by the behavior of some members who seems to indicate that we are in some sort of race with one another. And these members seem to send out a message that says - if their issue is not listed as top priority goal then all other issues that IV is working to resolve or all the work being done by IV is worthless. I am slightly disturbed to read posts like the one from wam4wam which says that he/she hopes that bill is not passed till his/her name check is cleared.

    This is a sincere request to everybody. If all that we think about is 'what's in it for me', then we cannot find commonality among ourselves. And thus no progress is possible. Know that with this thought process, nothing will happen.

    IV is an organization made by people like you and me. If everybody's objective is to get to the next stage of green card process, know that we are not behaving like matured and "educated" class that we all claim to belong. Just reaching the next stage of the process is something like looking for instant gratification which actually doesn't help the cause or the complete green card process.

    Most humbly, I would like to request you to post your experiences with how many people you have communicated about the efforts of IV? How many people you have convinced to join IV? What is the success rate? Were you able to persuade the people to contribute for this cause? Those things will help more than anything else. If IV is bigger and stronger, we can together address each and every issue. Ask yourself, how is it possible to continue to include more agendas and not come up with more helping hands and more resources and expect to succeed?

    If you do not see a favorable post or see a post that doesn't contain something that you want to hear, please do not infer that nobody cares or as if no one is doing anything. That post may just express somebody's opinion. I must mention that everybody wants their agenda to be pushed to the top. If there is some sort of a debate from others in the forum, I see that group of people starts backing off and starts posting messages to communicate as if this forum or IV is not doing what it should; Or some people start posting messageas hoping that bill will not pass if their agenda is not addressed.....and on and on. Please let me share that this doesn't help anybody.

    retrohato, Would you like to take the lead on making name check to the forefront and address it in every possible manner? IV needs sincere people like you who can spend time to do each task. We have very good ideas on how to approach this issue and find a solution to this issue. If you could please take the lead on this issue, know that name check is top priority of IV. I would request you to please call us at anytime convenient for you and express that you would like to work on this issue. We need people who are ready to take ownership of issues and are ready to deliver. Would you like to join this effort actively?

    Just so that everybody know, Immigration Voice could include 'World Peace' as one of the agenda items. But just including something as Goal doesn't mean that it can be achieved. To achieve anything that is listed as goals or to meaningfully add anything to the goals we need more serious people and more resources. If you are interested to actively contribute, please call us and we will connect you to the larger group of people to team-up the work for this issue. It is ok if you are not able to participate actively. It would help if you could please encourage others to take up the responsibility. Just because people are not agreeing with you, posting negative or discouraging messages will not help anybody.

    America is a great nation. That is why we want to stay here and want our GC sooner. JFK once said that 'Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country'. One of the reasons why America is Great is because of the people of this great nation delivered what JFK said. We all could learn from this and before making any claim to being part of the American fabric or before claiming to be from "educated" class, maybe we need to stop behaving in way that only sends out the message 'what's in it for me'.





    girlfriend on Audrey Kitching#39;s Blog audrey kitching. audrey kitching
  • audrey kitching



  • imneedy
    05-06 04:57 PM
    I dont think we should relay on their 15 months time line. Its too late. I am sure in coming 15 months whole immigration system will be changed. May be we will see point based system or something different. And at that time information will be no use. They are smart that is why they gave us 15 months. They will wait for 12 months to Congress to do something and then if nothing happen they will write SQL query in last 3 months.

    gc_on_demand, did you or anyone else here got similar letter?





    hairstyles Audrey Kitching audrey kitching. Audrey Kitching #39;Coco De
  • Audrey Kitching #39;Coco De



  • msgrewal81
    02-18 06:04 PM
    I agree. it makes things easier for illegals and difficult(LC process) for legals.

    I have Punjabi background. My uncles came to this country illegally. they always make fun of me that why I came legally. They were all given green cards by Reagan and Clinton.:mad:





    Jaime
    09-12 03:06 PM
    EVERYONE, we're meeting in DC next Tuesday!!! You can STILL MAKE IT!!! WE NEED YOU THERE!!!!





    bank_king2003
    04-09 04:29 PM
    Dude i must say, it must have taken a huge effort to come up with all this. But guess what, it wont make a dent. There are way too many Indians, Chinese and Mexicans in line and too few GC's to give out.

    You are right that it wont make any dent not becasue of the numbers of indians, chinease or mexicans but because we failed to identify the problem at a basic level.

    if we have a clear answer and hold on following questions i think then only we can make USCIS/DOS to behave.

    1) Is USCIS or DOS accountable for anything? if they do anything wrong can we do anything?

    2) If USCIS post incorrect and bogus numbers of demand do we have a right or anything to challenge them?

    3) If USCIS says that they are doing quarterly spillover and don't do that can we do anything legally?



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Total Pageviews

    Blog Archive