ryan reynolds scarlett johansson

images Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan+reynolds+and+scarlett
  • Ryan+reynolds+and+scarlett



  • immigrant2007
    09-10 12:50 PM
    Thats what exactly I said

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/1984591-post28.html

    sorry brother..didn't see your post earlier...but that makes two os us thinking the same way.....I think we should ask for more transprecany from USCIS/DOs on numbers and approvals and all backdoors being closed.





    wallpaper Ryan+reynolds+and+scarlett ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan and Scarlett are kaput…
  • Ryan and Scarlett are kaput…



  • GCNirvana007
    10-12 11:15 AM
    The part I didnt understand is how come you are so stupid? I hope you carry your passport when you go to the bathroom also because a dumb ass sheep like you probably needs it.

    Mr.Bhootia - It wont take a second to type back the same.

    I mentioned about LAW and you are calling me stupid, that explains how you roll isnt it.





    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett
  • Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett



  • little_willy
    10-15 06:14 PM
    Nixtor - In the poll question you talk about providing your receipt number but I don't see any mentions about that in the document. Do you expect us to include our receipt # with this request. Please clarify.





    2011 Ryan and Scarlett are kaput… ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Tag: ryan reynolds scarlett
  • Tag: ryan reynolds scarlett



  • kumar1
    12-10 02:02 PM
    There used to be a guy called VLDRAO.....self proclaimed DOS visa bulletin expert. Where is he these days? I would love to hear from him.


    VLDRAO......save us!!!!!



    more...


    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. actress Scarlett Johansson
  • actress Scarlett Johansson



  • sin94
    05-26 06:05 PM
    I haven't heard anything like this (yes random checks I seen by cops in NJ) but not searching all cars on a highway and then verifying if everyone is legal and harassing them if they have not carried their immigration papers.

    I read long ago after 9/11 that law enforcements used this tactic to jail folks who were suspected terrorists but if they are using this to discourage immigration (legal immigrants) it would be a real shame.

    where are these commands coming from its not like one county suddenly gets up and starts doing random inspection, their must be a higher authority who is making these rules





    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Johansson filed her divorce
  • Johansson filed her divorce



  • rayoflight
    05-27 06:38 PM
    Well you can certainly make copies but I was talking about making 'color' copies. As far as I know making color copies is illegal.



    more...


    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Scarlett Johansson
  • Scarlett Johansson



  • gsc999
    09-26 08:55 PM
    Here's a classic example ..

    If you look at the other threads on this forum you have people against the Durban bill coz it affects F-1 students . There is another section which is against Grassley coz it'll affect Consultants trying to get H1-B. I do understand Grassley's bill can have many implications and need to be opposed, but the focus still has to be towards alleviating the Employment based GC issues.

    I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards. period. thats what is started out to be and needs to come back on that track instead of trying to act as a platform for all Legal Immigration issues.

    Simply put IV is " EB-1/2/3- related org" ok..ok.. add in those millionaires who put in a million dollars for GC too.

    ---
    Hi,

    Thanks for your feedback:
    "I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards."

    Your comment doesn't make sense to me. Please explain.





    2010 Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett
  • Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett



  • at0474
    12-22 12:24 AM
    lazycis,

    Thanks for the quick reply.That was useful information. I also read the document on the link you posted.

    This had happened to a dependant visa holder(h4). It was not renewed in a timely manner alongwith h1b. However, passports were sent for revalidation (in the past, we used to be able to do revalidatoin of visa by mailing the passports to st.louis) and the passports were stamped with new visas. Upon realizing overstay later on (over 1 year), according to legal counsel, she left the country and re-entered with a new I-94. This had made it possible to fall into the cycle of h4 extensions since last entry.

    However, her pending I-485 seems problematic.

    Is there any way out other than hoping that IO would not notice it? Her brother is a U.S citizen and her daughter too. Does that help? I doubt it...

    Thanks.



    more...


    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett
  • Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett



  • sanju
    02-19 02:58 PM
    Looks like lots of >5 years people here. :D
    It is my feeling that "Illegals>5 years" should not be preferred over "legals<5 years".


    really? so you mean illegals are not humans? Or just because you are not in the category, you think only you deserve to live a "respectable" "decent" life, and others should wait in line until you are satisfied. That way of looking at things is exactly the way Citizens look at green cards, people will green card look at non-green holders, people with H1/L1 look at illegals. And that behavior or way of looking at others can described in one phrase - "I'm better than you." And when rules are changed, and we can no longer subscribe t that "false" notion of "I'm better than you.", you think there is something wrong with the bill.

    What is wrong with the bill that gives everything that you want, and in addition to it, gives that "illegal alien" what he deserves, not on the grounds of a degree, which is merely a piece of paper, but on the grounds of how humans ought to treat other humans? This bill gives everything that legal skilled community wants, but idiots could not stop beating down on something being given to someone else. That's why the degree(S) that we have is nothing more than garbage, because even after acquiring these degrees, we have not acquired the KNOWLEDGE of how to treat others.

    You do what you do and I do what I do.

    One more thing, you can't do ANYTHING, other than coming to this anonymous forum and beating down the drum of righteousness, as if everything you have done is right, and others, who did no do the things the same way are somehow daemons. BULL.

    .





    hair Tag: ryan reynolds scarlett ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Scarlett Johansson happy about
  • Scarlett Johansson happy about



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue



    more...


    ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds Wants Babies
  • Ryan Reynolds Wants Babies



  • SpookyH1Alien
    11-13 02:47 PM
    I am with you !! Lets do whatever it takes to get the spill over. Thats our only chance.





    hot actress Scarlett Johansson ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Spouse: Scarlett Johansson
  • Spouse: Scarlett Johansson



  • RNGC
    09-19 04:36 PM
    Million thanks to IV's superior organization. I am glad that my friends and I attended this event. It's just a little sad to see the local news channels reported the small protests by illegal immigrants in the Prince William County in MD but not our well-organized rally. Many people passing by us still think we are undocumented. I fully support the ideas from other members that we should highlight "LEGAL" everywhere.


    I am suprised too!!! I just saw couple news agencies covering this rally....IV organisers did a great job in pulling this one....

    but I am just curious to know why there was very little TV coverage for this event.....



    more...


    house Scarlett Johansson and ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds Scarlett
  • Ryan Reynolds Scarlett



  • zuhail
    03-10 01:09 PM
    Hello,
    I strongly suggest that we focus our time and efforts on a single and achievable target in this calendar year 2009.
    Recapturing unused visa numbers from the last two decades would help us eliminate the retrogression issue. Other changes like Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Eliminating per country limits etc would require a leap of faith in the political process and it is unlikely to be achieved in this calendar year. The economy, unemployment rates, health care etc are bound to dominate the legislative agenda this year.

    I suggest writing a petition or letter to the White House and the administrative offices strongly urging them to recapture the unused visa numbers.
    I think we should follow the KISS ("Keep it Simple, Stupid") Principle to achieve this target.
    If we add any other immigration provisions, it would increase the complexity of the legislation and it is bound to fail.
    Could the administrators of this forum please consider my suggestion of focusing on recapturing the visa numbers and assign this task the highest priority.

    By re-capturing the visa numbers, we are not asking for any change in the immigration laws. We are simply asking to use the visa numbers that had been lost due to inefficient processing by the USCIS.

    Let us start preparing a petition and create a dedicated fund to achieve this goal of visa number recapturing.

    Thank you.





    tattoo Johansson filed her divorce ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. scarlett johansson divorce
  • scarlett johansson divorce



  • .soulty
    03-02 07:52 AM
    nice link blue.. yep learning-maya is a great resource, make sure you also check out the partners on the right on that learning-maya link. ;)



    more...


    pictures Scarlett Johansson ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Gallery: Ryan Reynolds
  • Gallery: Ryan Reynolds



  • whiteStallion
    09-10 04:27 PM
    i guess they were very happy that they discussed the horse issue and they decided to take a well deserved break...as for 5882 who cares, as one poster mentioned, the horses are US citizens and they support the economy by eating grass. Republicans are happy because legal horses will be eating legal grass as opposed to illegals cutting and shipping grass to the horses. Democrats will be happy because the horses are well looked after.



    Nice humour!





    dresses Spouse: Scarlett Johansson ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Scarlett Johansson. Scarlett
  • Scarlett Johansson. Scarlett



  • .soulty
    03-11 07:23 PM
    we all done here?



    more...


    makeup Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Scarlett Johansson and
  • Scarlett Johansson and



  • Dhundhun
    07-12 09:28 PM
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20141

    Somebody with Nov05 PD tried to renew EAD and was given a 3 month EAD.......

    Use of "01" instead of "10" has been common mistake by USCIS. I came across couple of such cases. This is typo error and they will fix it.





    girlfriend scarlett johansson divorce ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. great for Ryan Reynolds to
  • great for Ryan Reynolds to



  • immi_2006
    09-26 10:29 AM
    Check this

    http://morejazzbythebay.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/cnn-misreports-purpose-of-immigrationvoice-rally/

    Lets spread the message....





    hairstyles Ryan Reynolds Wants Babies ryan reynolds scarlett johansson. Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett
  • Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett



  • needhelp!
    09-26 11:43 AM
    It needs to be already fixed by now!! Imagine how many have already read this and all the DAMAGE it has already done!
    I am so disappointed. I didn't go all the way to DC for THIS!!
    Please continue to press for the fix.
    I just got a call from Eilene Zimmerman regarding the article and she promised me that she is working on fixing the error soon





    Administrator2
    06-10 04:20 PM
    Please send message to your Senator to oppose this amendment. Here is the link to send the message.

    Action Alert: Vote NO Sanders amendment S.A. 4319 to pass H.R.4213. (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum85-action-items-for-everyone/1598151-action-alert-vote-no-sanders-amendment-s-a-4319-to-pass-h-r-4213-a.html)





    sheela
    07-13 08:53 AM
    Let us see the approvals trend till october. I am guessing the PD will move back to MID 2005 or 2004 by October for EB-2 India.

    I don't agree. It will stay same or forward in small increments with new fiscal yr numbers available. I am saying so because EB2 I stayed for such long at 04/07 and everyone knows fewer LCs were filed/approved between 04 and 05.



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Total Pageviews

    Blog Archive